The client asks your cleaning team to cover an additional meeting room. A few weeks later, pantry cleaning becomes more frequent because more employees are returning to the office. Then your supervisor starts receiving requests to clean up after evening events.
Each request seems manageable on its own. Your team wants to maintain the relationship, and asking for additional payment over every small task may feel unnecessarily difficult. However, the monthly contract fee stays the same while the work steadily increases.
The right time to review the arrangement is when those requests create a meaningful, recurring change in the resources needed to deliver the service. You do not need to wait until the contract makes a loss. First establish what changed, how much it costs and which commercial adjustment would make the arrangement sustainable.
Start With the Service You Originally Agreed to Provide
Before treating a task as additional work, check the original scope. The agreement may define areas, cleaning frequencies, operating hours and particular services. It may also include occasional duties that were already allowed for in the price.
Bring together the signed agreement, quotation, schedules and subsequent approved changes. Compare those documents with what the team actually does today. A difference between the original roster and current activity does not automatically establish that the client requested something outside the contract.
For example, an extra washroom round might be additional work under one agreement but part of an existing service requirement under another. Cleaning needed because the original work was incomplete should also be distinguished from a genuine expansion of scope.
The purpose is to establish a fair baseline. A renegotiation supported by an accurate comparison is more constructive than one based on a general feeling that the site has become busier.
Make Small Requests Visible Before They Become Routine
Additional work often enters through informal channels. A receptionist asks a cleaner for help, a facilities manager sends a message to the supervisor, or a tenant requests a task during a site visit. Finance may never see those requests.
Introduce a simple record of extra duties. Note what was requested, who requested it, how often it occurred and the approximate time or materials involved. Use enough detail to support a review without burdening staff with excessive administration.
Look for repetition. A one-off clean after an unexpected spill is different from cleaning an event area every Friday evening. Once a task becomes predictable, it belongs in the discussion about the ongoing service arrangement.
Give frontline staff a clear escalation process. They should know whom to contact when a request affects the roster, requires specialist equipment or delays scheduled work. That allows management to address the commercial question while staff continue communicating professionally with the client.
Separate Scope Changes From Delivery Problems
Higher site costs can arise for several reasons. Extra client requests are one possibility, but inefficient scheduling, excessive travel, equipment problems and repeated corrective cleaning may also contribute.
Review these causes separately. If a machine breaks down and the team needs longer to complete an unchanged task, that is an internal operating issue. If the client adds another floor or increases the cleaning frequency, the resource requirement has changed.
Some situations involve both. An additional task might be reasonable, but poor scheduling could make it more expensive than necessary. Management should understand the efficient cost of the revised service before deciding what to propose.
This distinction improves the client discussion. You can explain the change you are pricing while taking responsibility for issues that belong within your own operation. It also prevents a fee increase from concealing a process problem that will continue to erode margins.
Calculate the Cost of the Work Now Being Delivered
Prepare an updated site cost schedule using actual activity. Include labour, applicable employer costs, consumables, equipment, transport and supervision on a consistent basis.
Be precise about labour. An additional task might create overtime or require another employee, but it might initially fit within paid hours. In that case, the immediate cash cost may be limited while the task still consumes capacity previously available for other duties.
Avoid counting the same cost twice. If the labour rate already includes particular employment costs, do not add them again as a separate allowance. Explain how shared supervision and transport have been assigned to the site.
Compare the revised schedule with both the original estimate and recent actual spending. That shows whether the contract was underpriced from the beginning, changed after commencement or affected by a combination of factors.
See How Recurring Extras Reduce the Site Contribution
Consider a hypothetical cleaning contract with a monthly fee of S$12,000. The costs assigned to delivering the agreed service total S$9,000, leaving S$3,000 towards central overheads and profit.
The client’s additional requests now require 60 extra paid labour hours each month. Assume the complete additional labour cost is S$22 per hour, giving S$1,320. Extra consumables cost S$180, and additional transport and supervision add S$300.
The recurring additional cost is therefore S$1,800. Total site costs rise to S$10,800, and the amount remaining falls from S$3,000 to S$1,200.
The contract still produces a positive contribution on this basis, but that contribution has fallen by 60%. Waiting until it reaches zero would allow much of the commercial value to disappear before management acts.
These are illustrative figures, excluding tax and assuming the costs are measured consistently. They show why a stable monthly invoice can hide a material deterioration in earnings.
Decide What the Revised Price Needs to Achieve
In the example, increasing the fee by S$1,800 would cover the additional cost and restore the original S$3,000 monthly contribution. The new fee would be S$13,800.
However, that would not restore the original contribution percentage of 25%. With costs of S$10,800, a fee of S$14,400 would leave S$3,600, equal to 25% of the revised fee.
Neither figure automatically determines the price the client should accept. They answer different management questions: preserving the original contribution amount or preserving its percentage of revenue.
Consider the wider commercial circumstances, including the duration of the commitment, reliability of payment and resources required to serve the site. Set a reasoned negotiating position rather than adding an arbitrary percentage to the existing fee.
Review Before the Extra Work Damages the Agreed Service
Financial deterioration is one trigger for a discussion, but operational strain may appear earlier. Supervisors may repeatedly move staff from other sites, scheduled tasks may be delayed, or the team may struggle to complete work within the agreed hours.
These signs suggest that the current scope and resources no longer align. Continuing to absorb requests can eventually affect the very service standards the client expects.
Set internal review triggers suited to the business. Examples include recurring additional hours, a sustained reduction in contribution or requests requiring another shift. These are management signals to review the arrangement, not automatic rights to increase the price.
Where the contract contains a change-control or review process, use it. If the wording or authority to vary the arrangement is unclear, resolve that before assuming additional charges can be imposed.
Offer a Defined Choice to the Client
A renegotiation is easier to assess when it presents concrete options. Explain the original service, the recurring additions and the resources needed to deliver the expanded scope.
One option might be to retain the existing fee and return to the agreed scope. Another could provide the expanded service at a revised monthly price. Occasional duties might instead be quoted separately when requested.
Changes to frequency or scheduling can also be discussed where appropriate. The client may value certain tasks more than others and prefer to redirect resources within the existing budget. Any adjustment should preserve the service standards and requirements that remain applicable.
Avoid presenting an unexplained lump-sum increase. A clear proposal helps the client understand what it is buying and gives both parties a basis for measuring delivery afterwards.
Distinguish Recurring Duties From Occasional Jobs
Not every extra task belongs in the monthly fee. A regular additional cleaning round is different from a one-off post-event clean or specialist treatment.
For recurring work, an updated service schedule can specify the area, frequency and resources included. For occasional work, establish how a quotation is requested and approved before the job begins.
Consider a schedule of rates where it would simplify frequent requests, but define what those rates cover. Minimum call-out charges, equipment requirements and access arrangements may affect the cost of a small job.
Keep the process proportionate. The aim is to prevent uncertainty about payment while allowing the client to obtain additional help efficiently. An approval process that nobody follows will not protect the margin.
Confirm Who Can Authorise Additional Spending
The person asking for work may not have authority to approve the resulting charge. This can create a dispute after your team has already completed the task and incurred the cost.
Agree the authorised client contacts and the form of approval required. For a multi-tenant property, distinguish requests from individual occupants from instructions issued by the contracting client.
Your own team also needs clear limits. Supervisors should understand which requests they may accommodate, which need management approval and which require a quotation. Record any agreed goodwill exception so it does not silently become the new service standard.
Do not rely on a later invoice to establish terms that were never agreed. Keep the approval and the work record connected so that billing follows the actual commercial arrangement.
Check Whether the Revised Arrangement Improves Cash Flow
An approved fee increase helps profitability, but collection timing still matters. Additional labour and supplies may need to be paid before the revised invoice is settled.
Confirm the effective date, billing reference and any purchase-order requirements. If the client’s system still recognises only the old contract value, an otherwise agreed invoice may be delayed.
Track additional jobs separately enough to identify unbilled work and disputed amounts. Delays in submitting supporting records can turn approved activity into a prolonged funding requirement.
Include the revised receipts and payments in the cash forecast. Management should know whether expanding the service requires temporary funding even after the new price has been accepted.
Assess the Alternatives if the Client Declines
If the client does not accept the proposed change, review the available options within the contract. These may include maintaining the original scope, agreeing a smaller expansion or addressing the price at the next renewal.
Assess the financial consequences carefully. Ending a contract does not necessarily remove every cost assigned to it. Employees, vehicles and central overheads may remain while replacement work is found.
Equally, retaining a demanding account may prevent the business from taking on more suitable work. Consider what capacity is genuinely constrained and whether there is a realistic alternative use for it.
Avoid an automatic decision based solely on revenue size or a fully allocated loss. Compare future receipts, costs that would change and practical commitments under each option. Respect the existing contract while deciding the longer-term commercial position.
Use Contract-Level Reporting to Catch the Next Change Earlier
A monthly site review should connect the fee earned with labour hours, consumables, additional jobs and significant operational issues. Compare the result with the agreed scope and the assumptions used when pricing the contract.
Use the report to identify action rather than simply explain the previous month. A recurring increase in hours might require a scheduling improvement, a scope discussion or both. Assign responsibility and review whether the action changes the result.
Royal Premier provides accounting and management reporting services. Organised site records can give cleaning business owners a clearer basis for understanding contract performance and preparing evidence-based commercial discussions.
A helpful team can strengthen a client relationship, but recurring additional work needs a clear place in the agreement. Review the contract when the service materially changes, quantify the resources involved and propose terms that both parties understand. That gives the business a better chance of maintaining service quality without allowing the margin to disappear.
Recent Comments